Time has come to look a bit deeper?

There is talk US government begins investigating charities that may have received taxpayers money channeled by USAID. And while I tend to ignore rumours altogether, and do not suggest AW did receive any such funds, possible investigation sounds plausible. We all know Harry and Megz charity does zero fundraising, which has been marked as red flag by the Charity Watch a while ago, so let's see if there is something more than rumours about AW's strange donations schemes. Do you think it is completely legit and transparent?

PS. I want to quote the following passage from the Charity Watch review of AW:

"One red flag CharityWatch identified in the charity’s expense reporting for 2022 is $0 reported fundraising expenses. It costs money to raise money, so a charity reporting that it spent nothing to raise over $2 million in contributions heightens the suspicion that it may not be allocating its expenses correctly. The value of the time a staff member spends soliciting donations is a fundraising expense, for example, as are general office expenses incurred to do so, such as telephone, supplies, and any fundraising event costs. It is extremely rare for a charity to be able to raise significant donations without spending even one penny to do so"

".Though the charity reports a total of five “Officers, Directors, Trustees, Key Employees, and Highest Compensated Employees” (IRS Form 990, Part VII), it reports only two board members—“Meghan, The Duchess of Sussex” and “Prince Harry, The Duke of Sussex.” This in not in keeping with widely accepted best practices in the United States for nonprofit boards of directors, which generally advise a minimum board size of five to seven members. According to the IRS, “Small boards run the risk of not representing a sufficiently broad public interest and of lacking the required skills and other resources required to effectively govern the organization.”

https://blog.charitywatch.org/archewell-foundation-charitywatch-rating/